Repro Steps:
1. Create a VM on host1
2. Make host1 capacity full by deploying multiple VMs
3. Try Dynamic scaling on VM on host1
4. NPE occurs when MS tries to find host to migrate the VM and then scale.
Root cause: VM profile is not initiated properly with serviceoffering before planning for deployment
Solution: Iniate VM profile with serviceoffering and also make sure custom compute parameters are handled
When a VPC is restarted, the networks in the VPC is not restarted, this PR will add the logic to restart the networks in the VPC that needs a restart when the VPC is restarted.
Fixes#3816
BackupSync task would switch between databases to update backup usage
metrics in the cloud_usage.usage_backup table. The current framework
and the usage in ManagedContext causes database connection
(LegacyTransaction) leaks. When the thread runs faster, the issue is
easily reproducible and checking via heap dump analysis or using JMX
MBeans. This fixes by moving the task of backup data updation for
usage data to the usage server by publishing usage events instead of
switching between databases in a local thread while in a
ManagedContextRunnable.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Root cause:
Even though dynamic scaling job is handled in vmworkjob queue which ensures serilizing multiple jobs but the database updating and generating usage events are out of the job queue.
Solution:
Moved all updations into the job queue
Firstly I have tested all the scenarios to check if nothing is broken:
Scaling on a running VM with normal compute offering
Scaling on a stopped VM with normal compute offering
Scaling on a running VM with custom compute offering
Scaling on stopped VM with custom compute offering
Scaling on stopped/running VM between custom compute offering and normal compute offering and combinations among these. Checked if the custom parameters have been populated or deleted accordingly based on the offering to which the VM is scaled
Since this is a corner scenario I could not test the exact point where two usage events are recorded at the same time for two different API calls on same VM.
Fix to pick the max data volumes limit using the actual hypervisor version, instead of "default" version. Use the hypervisor version in the host table when product_version parameter in host details doesn't exist or is empty
Fixes#4101
In the list publicipaddress api call, display the network
name if ip is associated to shared network
Co-authored-by: Rakesh Venkatesh <r.venkatesh@global.leaseweb.com>
Allow VR's to be searched using its redundant state
Under Infrastructure -> Virtual Routers -> Search box
we can search using "MASTER", "BACKUP" and this will display
the VR's matching the state.
Co-authored-by: Rakesh Venkatesh <r.venkatesh@global.leaseweb.com>
Only admins should be able to search VM by instance name
Customers should not see or serach VM's using the instance name (i-)
Co-authored-by: Rakesh Venkatesh <r.venkatesh@global.leaseweb.com>
This update turns on certificate revocation checking for uploaded certificates:
- Updated `CertServiceImpl` to be able to enable revocation checking.
- Introduced a new parameter `ENABLED_REVOCATION_CHECK` for `UploadSslCertCmd`.
- Updated `CertServiceTest`.
Even if no CLRs are specified via `PKIXParameters`, the certificates
themselves may still provide info for revocation checking:
- The AIA extension may contains a URL to the OCSP responder.
- The CLRDP extension contains a URL to the CLR.
Those extensions may need to be explicitly enabled by setting the system properties `com.sun.security.enableAIAcaIssuers` and `com.sun.security.enableCRLDP` to true. See [Java PKI Programmer's Guide](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/security/java-pki-programmers-guide.html).
Using a revoked certificate may be dangerous. One of the most common reasons why a certificate authority (CA) revokes a certificate is that the private key has been compromised. For example, the private key might have been stolen by an adversary.
If I understand correctly, the `CertServiceImpl` bean is used for operations with certificates on a load balancer. In particular, it validates a certificate chain without revocation checking while uploading a certificate. If a compromised revoked certificate is then used by the load balancer, then it may result to compromising TLS connections. However, the attacker has to be able to implement man-in-the-middle attack to compromise the connections. So the attacker has to be quite powerful. Therefore, such an attack is definitely not easy to implement. On the other hand, the impact may be significant because of loss of confidentiality.
This has been discussed on security@cloudstack.apache.org
* 4.13:
Snapshot deletion issues (#3969)
server: Cannot list affinity group if there are hosts dedicated… (#4025)
server: Search zone-wide storage pool when allocation algothrim is firstfitleastconsumed (#4002)
Though VMware does not support security groups, but in a basic zone with VMware and no isolation VMs should be able to deploy.
Root cause:
In case of VMware and basic zone control nic is set to 0.0.0.0 assuming control network will be shared with guest network.
But to have access to VMware instances management/private needs to be assigned to it.
Solution:
Assing a private ip even in case of basic zone VMware.
dahn
Rohit Yadav
davidjumani
harikrishna-patnala
Spaceman1984
sureshanaparti
deargopinath
Rakesh
Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Nicolas Vazquez
Artem Smotrakov
Lucas Asth
andrijapanicsb
dahn
Sina Kashipazha
Wei Zhou
Andrija Panic
pavanaravapalli