- Changes merged from planner_reserve branch
- Exposing deploymentplanner as an optional parameter while creating a service offering
- changes to DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl to make sure host reserve-release happens between conflicting planner usages.
When a host is not considered for deployment because it has disabled HVM, then call that out in the logs for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Nitin Mehta<nitin.mehta@citrix.com>
Fixed the bug where vm_instance.ha_enabled wasn't updated during service offering upgrade
Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java
2) Added new api - changeServiceForSystemVm - to support service offering upgrade for system vms
3) Removed global config parameters that are not in use anymore: consoleproxy.ram.size, consoleproxy.cpu.mhz, secstorage.vm.ram.size, secstorage.vm.cpu.mhz
Changes:
To migrate systems using 'use.user.concentrated.pod.allocation' as true and 'vm.allocation.algorithm' as true, we need to
add following changes:
- There will be 5 values to 'vm.allocation.algorithm': 'random', 'firstfit', 'userdispersing', 'userconcentratedpod_random', 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit'
- 'userconcentratedpod_random' means we apply user concentration to pods and clusters. To hosts and pools we use random ordering.
- 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit' means we apply user concentration to pods and clusters. To hosts and pools we use firstfit ordering.
Changes:
- Added a two new deployment planners 'UserDispersingPlanner' and 'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' to the DeploymentPlanners
- Planner can be chosen by setting the global config variable 'vm.allocation.algorithm' to either of the following values:
('random', 'firstfit', 'userdispersing', 'userconcentratedpod')
- By default, the value is 'random'. When the value is 'random', FirstFitPlanner is invoked as before that shuffles the resource lists.
- Now Admin can choose whether the deployment heuristic should be applied starting at cluster or pod level. This can be done by using the
global config variable 'apply.allocation.algorithm.to.pods' which is false by default. Thus by default as earlier, planner starts at clusters directly.
'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' changes:
- Earlier to 3.0, FirstFitPlanner used to reorder the clusters in case this heuristic was chosen.
- Now this is done by a separate planner and is applied only when 'vm.allocation.algorithm' is set to this planner
- It reorders the capacity based clusters/pods such that those pods having more number of Running Vms for the given account are tried first.
- Note that this userconcentration is applied only to pods and clusters. Not to hosts or storagepools within a cluster.
'UserDispersingPlanner' changes:
- 'UserDispersingPlanner' reorders the capacity ordered pods and clusters based on number of 'Running' VMs for the given account in ascending order. Aim is to choose thodes pods/clusters first which have less number of Running VMs for the given account
- Admin can provide weights to capacity and user dispersion so that both parameters get considered in reordering the pods/clusters. This can be done by setting
the global config parameter 'vm.user.dispersion.weight'. Default value is 1. Thus if this planner is chosen, by default, ordering will be done only by number of Running Vms, unless the weight is changed.
- HostAlllocators and StoragePoolAllocators also reorder the hosts and pools by ascending order of number of Running VMS/ Ready Volumes respectively for the given account. Thus try to choose that host or pool within a cluster with less number of VMs for the account.
move all listxxx interface from HostDao to managers(ResourceManager, SecondaryStorageVmManager etc) with decent name using SearchCriteria2
or direct call SearchCriteria2 on demand
Changes:
To make sure migration does not attempt to pick a host that has running VMs more than the max guest VM's limit:
- Changed manual migration to call host allocators to return a list of hosts suitable for migration. Host allocators check for the max guest VM limit.
- Earlier we returned hosts with enough capacity but now Host Allocators make other checks along with capacity. So the list of hosts returned are hosts that have enough capacity AND satisfy all other conditions like host tags, max guests limit etc. Or in other words Allocators dont return the hosts that dont satisfy all conditions even if they have capacity.
-Therefore, now we mark the list of hosts returned for manual migration as 'suitable' hosts instead of 'hasenoughCapacity' in the HostResponse.
- HA migration already calls allocators, so no change is needed there.
Changes:
- Adding a new table 'hypervisor_capabilities' that will record capabilities for each hypervisor version. Added db schema changes for this.
- Currently a few capabilities have been added, namely, 'max_guests_limit' and 'security_group_enabled'
- Added a new column 'hypervisor_version' to host table. StartupRouting command now takes in this parameter. It should be set when a host connects.
- If a host's hypervisor version is not present, we find all the capabilities rows for that hypervisor type and use the first record.
- 'max_guests_limit' is the maximum number of running guest Vms that a host can have for the given hypervisor.
- Host Allocators use this limit and skip a host if the number of running VMs on that host exceeds this limit.
Changes:
- CreateTemplate and RegisterTemplate now support adding a template tag. It is a string value. This is root-admin only action - only admin can add template tags.
- ListTemplates will return the template tag in response.
- HostAllocator changed to use template tag along with the existing tag on service offering. If both tags are present, allocator now finds hosts satisfying both tags. If no hosts have both tags, allocation will fail.
- DB changes to add new column to vm_template table.
- DB upgrade changes for upgrade from 2.2.10 to 2.2.11
status 10305: resolved fixed
While creating a system vm offering specify the type. If no type specified the default to domainrouter.
While requesting a set of system offering specify the paramter systemvmtype.
status 9623: resolved fixed
Also set ram_size to 1024 for console proxy offering during the upgrade
Conflicts:
core/src/com/cloud/vm/SecondaryStorageVmVO.java
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/allocator/impl/UserConcentratedAllocator.java
server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java
server/src/com/cloud/storage/allocator/LocalStoragePoolAllocator.java
server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java
Changes:
- Changed host allocators/planner to use cpu.overprovisioning.factor
- Removed following: while adding a new host, we were setting the total_cpu in op_host_capacity to be actual_cpu * cpu.overprovisioning.factor. Now we set it to actual_cpu.
- ListCapacities response now calculates the total CPU as actual * cpu.overprovisioning.factor (This change does not add anything new - listCapacities was pulling total CPU from op_host_capacity DB earlier which had the cpu.overprovisioning.factor applied already. Now we need to apply it over the DB entry.)
- HostResponse has a new field: 'cpuWithOverprovisioning' that returns the cpu after applying the cpu.overprovisioning.factor
- Db Upgrade 222 to 224 now updates the total_cpu in op_host_capacity to be the actual_cpu for each Routing host.
status 7704: resolved fixed
For user vm:
* for default network, take limit from the corresponding service offering
* for all additional networks, take limit from the network offerings
For domainRouter/SSVM/CPVM:
* get info from the network offering
Added new config parameter: "vm.network.throttling.rate". If nw_rate is NULL for serviceOffering, this parameter would be used for default vm's network
Alex Huang
Bharat Kumar
Prasanna Santhanam
Alex Huang
Edison Su
Prachi Damle
Min Chen
Devdeep Singh
Edison Su
Kelven Yang
Mice Xia
anthony
Prasanna Santhanam
David Nalley
Murali reddy
Alena Prokharchyk
frank
alena
frank
Abhinandan Prateek
Alex Huang