* send StartupAnswer right after StartupCommand is recieved
* if post processor going wrong, send out readycommand with error message to agent, then agent will exit
* attache is not forForward()
* and the Disconnect came through cluster notification event
The fix will prevent delayed AgentDisconnect cluster notification processing.
73be77a4c1
I've renamed discover to discoverer to fix the issue. My ant debug fails
with:
[java] ERROR [utils.component.ComponentLocator] (main:) Unable to
load configuration for management-server from components.xml
[java] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to
find class: com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.discoverer.KvmServerDiscoverer
RB: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6239/
Send-by: rohit.yadav@citrix.com
When a host is not considered for deployment because it has disabled HVM, then call that out in the logs for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Nitin Mehta<nitin.mehta@citrix.com>
Fixed the bug where vm_instance.ha_enabled wasn't updated during service offering upgrade
Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java
2) Added new api - changeServiceForSystemVm - to support service offering upgrade for system vms
3) Removed global config parameters that are not in use anymore: consoleproxy.ram.size, consoleproxy.cpu.mhz, secstorage.vm.ram.size, secstorage.vm.cpu.mhz
Description:
Adding overloaded addProxyObject() function to CloudException
and RuntimeCloudException classes and using this function
to stuff exceptions with IDs, to reduce code footprint.
Description:
1) Moved RuntimeCloudException from api/ to utils/.
Added simple constructor to RuntimeCloudException.
Modified all classes that extended RuntimeException
to extend RuntimeCloudException. These classes
are listed below:
ServerApiException
CloudAuthenticationException
CloudExecutionException
AsyncCommandQueued
HypervisorVersionChangedException
RuntimeCloudException
2) Added overloaded constructed to CloudException.
Modified all classes that extend Exception to extend CloudException instead.
These classes are listed below:
ConcurrentOperationException
ConflictingNetworkSettingsException
ConnectionException
DiscoveryException
InsufficientCapacityException
ManagementServerException
ResourceUnavailableException
VirtualMachineMigrationException
AgentControlChannelException
OperationTimedoutException.java
UnsupportedVersionException.java
UsageServerException.java
UnableDeleteHostException.java
AgentAuthnException.java
HttpCallException.java
ActiveFencingException.java
ClusterInvalidSessionException.java
GreTunnelException.java
OvsVlanExhaustedException.java
Changes:
- in case of external service providers, there is no discoverer that could load the resource.
- So we have to rely on agentMgr to load the resource as earlier.
Changes:
To migrate systems using 'use.user.concentrated.pod.allocation' as true and 'vm.allocation.algorithm' as true, we need to
add following changes:
- There will be 5 values to 'vm.allocation.algorithm': 'random', 'firstfit', 'userdispersing', 'userconcentratedpod_random', 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit'
- 'userconcentratedpod_random' means we apply user concentration to pods and clusters. To hosts and pools we use random ordering.
- 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit' means we apply user concentration to pods and clusters. To hosts and pools we use firstfit ordering.
Changes:
- We do not need these global setting anymore. These will be hidden since 3.0
- The default traffic label will be picked from the global setting which is null by default. When traffic label is null it means the resource uses tag on the default gateway
- Changes to invoke discoverer to reload the resource object on host connection
- Since a zone can have many physical networks, there can be multiple guest, public networks. Only the zone wide storage and management traffic label will be stored in host_details henceforth.
- If traffic labels are updated, discoverer should update the host_details
2. add ha parameter to dissconnect host to indicate if HA VMs on this host
status 12844, 13394: resolved fixed
reviewed-by : edison
Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java
server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/ClusteredAgentManagerImpl.java
we use 'update count' to make sure agent status transformation is atomic.
However, atomic means success or fail which is not true for agent status.
some important transformation occassionally fails because race condition that
some other one is changing it simultaneously which finally makes agent stuck in a
wrong status.
use reenterent lock to serialize the agent status transformation. this memory lock
works in clusterd environement as well because in our design an agent is only active
in one mgmt server
status 13269: resolved fixed
Changes:
- Added a two new deployment planners 'UserDispersingPlanner' and 'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' to the DeploymentPlanners
- Planner can be chosen by setting the global config variable 'vm.allocation.algorithm' to either of the following values:
('random', 'firstfit', 'userdispersing', 'userconcentratedpod')
- By default, the value is 'random'. When the value is 'random', FirstFitPlanner is invoked as before that shuffles the resource lists.
- Now Admin can choose whether the deployment heuristic should be applied starting at cluster or pod level. This can be done by using the
global config variable 'apply.allocation.algorithm.to.pods' which is false by default. Thus by default as earlier, planner starts at clusters directly.
'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' changes:
- Earlier to 3.0, FirstFitPlanner used to reorder the clusters in case this heuristic was chosen.
- Now this is done by a separate planner and is applied only when 'vm.allocation.algorithm' is set to this planner
- It reorders the capacity based clusters/pods such that those pods having more number of Running Vms for the given account are tried first.
- Note that this userconcentration is applied only to pods and clusters. Not to hosts or storagepools within a cluster.
'UserDispersingPlanner' changes:
- 'UserDispersingPlanner' reorders the capacity ordered pods and clusters based on number of 'Running' VMs for the given account in ascending order. Aim is to choose thodes pods/clusters first which have less number of Running VMs for the given account
- Admin can provide weights to capacity and user dispersion so that both parameters get considered in reordering the pods/clusters. This can be done by setting
the global config parameter 'vm.user.dispersion.weight'. Default value is 1. Thus if this planner is chosen, by default, ordering will be done only by number of Running Vms, unless the weight is changed.
- HostAlllocators and StoragePoolAllocators also reorder the hosts and pools by ascending order of number of Running VMS/ Ready Volumes respectively for the given account. Thus try to choose that host or pool within a cluster with less number of VMs for the account.
Edison Xu
Alena Prokharchyk
Darren Shepherd
Mice Xia
Edison Su
anthony
Prasanna Santhanam
David Nalley
Murali reddy
frank
Kelven Yang
Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Edison Su
prachi
kishan
Abhinandan Prateek
Alex Huang