2) Added new api - changeServiceForSystemVm - to support service offering upgrade for system vms
3) Removed global config parameters that are not in use anymore: consoleproxy.ram.size, consoleproxy.cpu.mhz, secstorage.vm.ram.size, secstorage.vm.cpu.mhz
Reviewed-By: Sheng Yang
Changes:
Added 'removed' column to physical_network_service_providers to avoid the Foreign Key constraint error.
Conflicts:
setup/db/db/schema-30to301.sql
1) Support HTTP keep-alive in clustering communication channel
2) Increase concurrency level for clustering message delivery
Reviewed-By: Kelven (with unit test)
1) Drop synchronized call semantic for ClusterManagerImpl.broadcast()
2) Have no choice now but to use an unbound thread pool to notify upper layer. This is to prevent thread starvation when we have cross-management server waitings.
Reviewed-By: Kelven(with unit test)
It's not a elegant fix. The status for firewall rules should remain unchanged
before/after ip association/disassociation. But the related change is tricky
than this fix, may not get enough test for 3.0.1. So we would apply existed
firewall rules again, which would work, just result in some unnecessary
commands.
status 14484: resolved fixed
Reviewed-by: Edison Su
Changes:
Fixed as described in the bug.
* CreateVlanIpRangeCmd still accept account/domainId info
* if account owns:
- one Isolated network with source nat service enabled, use this network
- more than one Isolated network with source nat service enabled - error out
- none Isolated networks with source nat service enabled, create it only in
case when there is an Isolated network offering with Availability=Required and
source nat service enabled.
The routing table with two nics may be messed up, due to we sent same
router(gateway) information from different DHCP server, in order to specify
default gateway. E.g.
Network A: 192.168.1.0/24, gw 192.168.1.1
Network B: 192.168.2.0/24, gw 192.168.2.1
User VM: Nic 1 connect to network A, get ip 192.168.1.10; nic 2 connect to
network B, get ip 192.168.2.10.
Set network A as the default network of user VM.
Currently we would send this information to user VM through DHCP offer:
In network A: dhcp-option:router 192.168.1.1
In network B: dhcp-option:router 192.168.1.1
So both NIC in the guest VM would receive 192.168.1.1 as router(gateway).
But, in CentOS 5.6, dhclient-scripts try to tell if the gateway is reachable
for current subnet.
So when we try to enable nic 2(eth1) of user VM, dhclient would receive:
IP: 192.168.2.10
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Router: 192.168.1.1
Then it would found that the specified gateway(router) is not within its own
subnet(192.168.2.0/24). But since we send out this ip(192.168.1.1) as the
gateway for it, dhclient thought that it should got someway to access the
network through this IP. So it would execute:
ip route add 192.168.1.1 dev eth1
ip route replace default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth1
But it can never reach 192.168.1.1(which is in the eth0's subnet and the
gateway of eth0) by go through eth1 interface. So it is messed up.
We've tested Windows 2008 R2, CentOS 5.3, CentOS 5.6 and Ubuntu 10.04. Windows
and Ubuntu are fine with above policy.
To solve this, we send different dhcp:router option according to the guest OS
type now.
We may need expand this list later, but for now we only know that CentOS and
RHEL would behavior in this way.
status 14042: resolved fixed
Changes done:
- Provide UUID for userid and domainid only while constructing the login response. Session will hold the DB id's as before, to ensure other parts keep working.
- This reverts commit de28aa3ddde5b601f2f234f2eccef871fbaf1a06.
Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java
Kelven Yang
Alena Prokharchyk
frank
prachi
kishan
Sheng Yang
Nitin Mehta
Edison Su
Abhi
Sheng Yang
Murali reddy