CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.
While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.
computing the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when the
volume is on a different storage pool.
Testing:
I couldnt write unittests for it. This class is not in a unittestable state.
manually tested in the below environment
1. xenserver 6.5 setup with 2 clusters and a host each in each of them.
2. added storage tags for the primary storage.
3. created two service offerings with the storage tags.
4. deployed two vms using newly created offerings in step 3.
5. at this stage, there are two vms one on each host with root disks on the corresponding primary.
6. create a data disk and attach it to vm1
7. detach the data disk. now the data disk is in the primary storage of the cluster of vm1 (let us say primary1)
8. attach this data disk to vm2(running on a host in different cluster)
9. the volume should be moved to the primary storage of another cluster and op_host_capacity should be accordingly updated.
* pr/873:
CLOUDSTACK-8896: allocated percentage of storage pool going beyond 100%
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
added more guest oscentos 6.6, centos 6.7, rhel 6.6, rhel 6.7, windows server 2016, rhel
7.2, centos 7.2
This closes#1244
* pr/1794:
Added more Guest OS and their mappings on the hypervisor
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9780: Fixed the default JAVA_HOME value to be Java8 if not setNow that PR-1888 is merged, Java8 is required. Unfortunately, the file pushed to `/etc/cloudstack/management/classpath.conf` on ACS install will default the version to Java7 instead of Java8 if JAVA_HOME is unset. This fix sets the default to Java8 if JAVA_HOME is not set.
* pr/1938:
Fixed the default JAVA_HOME value to be Java8 if not set
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9715: Update somaxconn value to default valueUpdated the somaxconn value to detault value 65535
* pr/1876:
CLOUDSTACK-9715: Update somaxconn value to default value
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-8950 Hypervisor Parameter check is not performed for registerTemplate and getUploadParamsForTemplate API'sAny string is allowed as hypervisor type from the api.
HypervisorType.getType() tries to validates with the enums and if nothing
matches sets the type as None.
Added a check to not allow None hypervisor type when registering.
will update test results and testing done later.
* pr/928:
CLOUDSTACK-8950 Hypervisor Parameter check is not performed for registerTemplate and getUploadParamsForTemplate API's
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
deleted by deleting 1 template on any zone
added extra warning message if it's a cross-zone template ("This is a
cross zone template and will be deleted from all the zones. Are you sure
you want to proceed?").
Marvin test to verify that adding TCP ports 500,4500 and 1701 in vpn should not failPlease refer to JIRA ticket for more details
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9117
Following is the result info:
Test to add TCP Port Forwarding rule for specific ports(500,1701 and 4500) in VPN ... === TestName: test_08_add_TCP_PF_Rule_In_VPN | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
---
Ran 1 test in 166.799s
OK
* pr/1183:
Marvin test to verify that adding TCP ports 500,4500 and 1701 in vpn should not fail Bug-Id: CS-43653 Reviewed-by: Self
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-8717: Failed to start instance after restoring the running instance Changing PR title and commit message
In continuation with PR #1411 and #667
* pr/1416:
CLOUDSTACK-8717: Failed to start instance after restoring the running instance
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
the destination pool is in maintenance mode do not allow a volume to be migrated to
the storage pool. Fixed it for volume migration and vm migration with volume.
This issue occurs when a volume in Ready state is moved across storage
pools.
While finding if the storage pool has enough space, it has a check to
consider the size of non Ready volumes only. This is true if the volume
to be attached to a vm is in the same storage pool. But, if the volume
is in another storage pool and has to be moved to a vm's storage pool,
the size of the volume should be considered in doing the space check.
computing the asking size when volume is not in ready state or when the
volume is on a different storage pool.
registerTemplate and getUploadParamsForTemplate API's
Any string is allowed as hypervisor type from the api.
HypervisorType.getType() tries to validate with the enums and if nothing
matches, sets the type as None.
Added a check to not allow None hypervisor type when registering.
[4.10] CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone with Security GroupsThis commit contains the following changes:
(1) implementation of assignVM in Advanced zone with Security Groups
(2) keep the default nic on shared network when assignVM
(3) allow migrate vm from/to project;
(4) UI change for selecting account/project/network
* pr/844:
CLOUDSTACK-7985: assignVM in Advanced zone with Security Groups
CLOUDSTACK-7985: keep the default nic on shared network when assignVM
CLOUDSTACK-7985: (1) allow migrate vm from/to project; (2) UI change for selecting account/project/network
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
[4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes in VRIn network VR, the routes to current subnets are missing in corresponding ip route Table.
It is a typo in commit 6749785cab
In VPC VR, it works fine.
* pr/1929:
CLOUDSTACK-9770: fix missing ip routes in VR
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
This closes#1644
* 4.9:
CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration
CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable
Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration
If snapshot.backup.rightafter is set to false (defaults to true), snapshots are
not backed up to secondary storage.
This is the same as PR #1644 applied to 4.9, as per @jburwell
* pr/1697:
CLOUDSTACK-4858 Honors the snapshot.backup.rightafter configuration variable Unhides snapshot.backup.rightafter from global configuration
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9738: [Vmware] Optimize vm expunge process for instances with vm snapshots## Description
It was noticed that expunging instances with many vm snapshots took a look of time, as hypervisor received as many tasks as vm snapshots instance had, apart from the delete vm task. We propose a way to optimize this process for instances with vm snapshots by sending only one delete task to hypervisor, which will delete vm and its snapshots
## Use cases
1. deleteVMsnapohsot-> no changes to current behavior
2. destroyVM with expunge=false -> no actions to VMsnaphsot is performed at the moment. When VM cleanup thread is executed it will perform the same sequence as (3). If instance is recovered before expunged by the cleanup thread it will remain intact with VMSnapshot chain present
3. destroyVM with expunge=true:
* Vmsnaphsot is marked with removed timestamp and state = Expunging in DB
* VM is deleted in HW
* pr/1905:
CLOUDSTACK-9738: [Vmware] Optimize vm expunge process for instances with vm snapshots
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9731: Hardcoded label appears on the Add zone wizardHardcoded label (label.remove.this.physical.network) appears on the Add zone wizard
* pr/1892:
CLOUDSTACK-9731: Hardcoded label appears on the Add zone wizard
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
* 4.9:
CLOUDSTACK-8805: Domains become inactive automatically. Handled the '%' case by replacing that with a literal character rather than a wildcard character.
CLOUDSTACK-8805: Domains become inactive automatically.Handled the '%' case by replacing that with a literal character rather than a wildcard character.
* pr/775:
CLOUDSTACK-8805: Domains become inactive automatically. Handled the '%' case by replacing that with a literal character rather than a wildcard character.
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
[4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in redundant VRsThe password server in RVRs has wrong parameters as the gateway of guest nics is None.
In this case, we should get the gateway from /var/cache/cloud/cmdline.
This issue is caused by commit 45642b8382
* pr/1871:
CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in redundant VRs
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
Without this information a NPE might be triggered when starting a VR, SSVM or CP
as this information is read from the 'nics' table and causes a NPE.
During deployment we should set the IPv6 Gateway and CIDR for the NIC object so that
it is persisted to the database.
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
Dockerfile: Upgrade base distro to Ubuntu 16.04, fix support for JDK8Fix current broken build introduce with JDK upgrade from #1888 of docker simulator because of missing dependencies and JDK8. This PR upgrade the distro to Ubuntu 16.04 and use default jdk version 8.
I've quickly test the build locally, no error in the UI and logs.
* pr/1921:
Upgrade base distro to Ubuntu 16.04, fix support for JDK8, fix dependencies, should fix current broken build of docker simulator
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
[4.10] CLOUDSTACK-8746: VM Snapshotting implementation for KVM
* pr/977:
Fixes for testing VM Snapshots on KVM. Related to PR 977
CLOUDSTACK-8746: vm snapshot implementation for KVM
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic NetworkingThis PR is a proposal for adding very basic IPv6 to Basic Networking. The main goal of this PR is that the API returns a valid IPv6 address over which the Instance is reachable.
The GUI will show the IPv6 address after deployment of the Instance.

If the table VLAN has a proper IPv6 CIDR configured the DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru will calculate the IPv6 Address the Instance will obtain using EUI-64 and SLAAC: https://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc4862
In this case the _vlan_ table contained:
<pre>mysql> select * from vlan \G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
uuid: 90e0716c-5261-4992-bb9d-0afd3006f476
vlan_id: vlan://untagged
vlan_gateway: 172.16.0.1
vlan_netmask: 255.255.255.0
description: 172.16.0.10-172.16.0.250
vlan_type: DirectAttached
data_center_id: 1
network_id: 204
physical_network_id: 200
ip6_gateway: 2001:980:7936:112::1
ip6_cidr: 2001:980:7936:112::/64
ip6_range: NULL
removed: NULL
created: 2016-07-19 20:39:41
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql></pre>
It will then log:
<pre>2016-10-04 11:42:44,998 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1975ec54 job-186/job-187 ctx-0d967d88) (logid:275c4961) Found IPv6 CIDR 2001:980:7936:112::/64 for VLAN 1
2016-10-04 11:42:45,009 INFO [c.c.n.g.DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-1975ec54 job-186/job-187 ctx-0d967d88) (logid:275c4961) Calculated IPv6 address 2001:980:7936:112:4ba:80ff:fe00:e9 using EUI-64 for NIC 6a05deab-b5d9-4116-80da-c94b48333e5e</pre>
The template has to be configured accordingly:
- No IPv6 Privacy Extensions
- Use SLAAC
- Follow RFC4862
This is also described in: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+in+Basic+Networking
The next steps after this will be:
- Security Grouping to prevent IPv6 Address Spoofing
- Security Grouping to filter ICMP, UDP and TCP traffic
* pr/1700:
CLOUDSTACK-676: IPv6 In -and Egress filtering for Basic Networking
CLOUDSTACK-676: IPv6 Basic Security Grouping for KVM
CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking with KVM
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>
CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshotsThis PR is to address a few issues in #1600 (which was recently merged to master for 4.10).
In StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.performCopyOfVdi we call getSnapshotDetails. In one such scenario, the source snapshot in question is coming from secondary storage (when we are creating a new volume on managed storage from a snapshot of ours thats on secondary storage).
This usually worked in the regression tests due to a bit of "luck": We retrieve the ID of the snapshot (which is on secondary storage) and then try to pull out its StorageVO object (which is for primary storage). If you happen to have a primary storage that matches the ID (which is the ID of a secondary storage), then getSnapshotDetails populates its Map<String, String> with inapplicable data (that is later ignored) and you dont easily see a problem. However, if you dont have a primary storage that matches that ID (which I didnt today because I had removed that primary storage), then a NullPointerException is thrown.
I have fixed that issue by skipping getSnapshotDetails if the source is coming from secondary storage.
While fixing that, I noticed a couple more problems:
1) We can invoke grantAccess on a snapshot thats actually on secondary storage (this doesnt amount to much because the VolumeServiceImpl ignores the call when its not for a primary-storage driver).
2) We can invoke revokeAccess on a snapshot thats actually on secondary storage (this doesnt amount to much because the VolumeServiceImpl ignores the call when its not for a primary-storage driver).
I have corrected those issues, as well.
I then came across one more problem:
When using a SAN snapshot and copying it to secondary storage or creating a new managed-storage volume from a snapshot of ours on secondary storage, we attach to the SR in the XenServer code, but detach from it in the StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy code (by sending a message to the XenServer code to perform an SR detach). Since we know to detach from the SR after the copy is done, we should detach from the SR in the XenServer code (without that code having to be explicitly called from outside of the XenServer logic).
I went ahead and changed that, as well.
JIRA Ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9619
* pr/1749:
CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots
Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karuturi@accelerite.com>