* 4.6:
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Uses the same vlan since it should have been already released
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Adds VPC static routes test
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Covers Private GW ACL with Redundant VPCs
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Add method to get list of Physical Networks per zone
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Removing unused parameter in integration test for projects
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Removing unused parameter in integration test
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Fixing affinity groups for projects
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Fixing affinity groups for projectsWith some contributions from @resmo and @ustcweizhou.
This closes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/508
To test manually (need at least 2 hosts):
Create a project
Create an affinity group in that project
Deploy a vm with that affinity group
Deploy a second vm with that affinity group
They should be on different hosts
Ran old and new tests for affinity groups on the simulator
Test create affinity group as admin in project ... === TestName: test_01_admin_create_aff_grp_for_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group as domain admin for projects ... === TestName: test_02_doadmin_create_aff_grp_for_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group as user for projects ... === TestName: test_03_user_create_aff_grp_for_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group that exists (same name) for projects ... === TestName: test_4_user_create_aff_grp_existing_name_for_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
#Delete Affinity Group by id. ... === TestName: test_01_delete_aff_grp_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
#Delete Affinity Group by id should fail for user not in project ... === TestName: test_02_delete_aff_grp_by_id_another_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_anti_affinity_group | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups with more vms than hosts. ... === TestName: test_02_deploy_vm_anti_affinity_group_fail_on_not_enough_hosts | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity group for a vm for projects ... === TestName: test_01_list_aff_grps_for_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List multiple affinity groups associated with a vm for projects ... === TestName: test_02_list_multiple_aff_grps_for_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity groups by id for projects ... === TestName: test_03_list_aff_grps_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by name for projects ... === TestName: test_04_list_aff_grps_by_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by non-existing id for projects ... === TestName: test_05_list_aff_grps_by_non_existing_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by non-existing name for projects ... === TestName: test_06_list_aff_grps_by_non_existing_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity group should list all for a vms associated with that group for projects ... === TestName: test_07_list_all_vms_in_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Update the list of affinityGroups by using affinity groupids ... === TestName: test_01_update_aff_grp_by_ids | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 16 tests in 581.706s
OK
Deploy vm as Admin in Affinity Group belonging to regular user (should fail) ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_another_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Create Affinity Group as admin for regular user ... === TestName: test_02_create_aff_grp_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups as admin for all the users ... === TestName: test_03_list_aff_grp_all_users | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups belonging to admin user ... === TestName: test_04_list_all_admin_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups belonging to regular user passing account id and domain id ... === TestName: test_05_list_all_users_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups belonging to regular user passing group id ... === TestName: test_06_list_all_users_aff_grp_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group belonging to regular user ... === TestName: test_07_delete_aff_grp_of_other_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group as admin ... === TestName: test_01_admin_create_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group as domain admin ... === TestName: test_02_doadmin_create_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group as user ... === TestName: test_03_user_create_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group that exists (same name) ... === TestName: test_04_user_create_aff_grp_existing_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group with existing name but within different account ... === TestName: test_05_create_aff_grp_same_name_diff_acc | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test create affinity group of non-existing type ... === TestName: test_06_create_aff_grp_nonexisting_type | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group by name ... === TestName: test_01_delete_aff_grp_by_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group as admin for an account ... === TestName: test_02_delete_aff_grp_for_acc | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group which has vms in it ... === TestName: test_03_delete_aff_grp_with_vms | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group with id which does not belong to this user ... === TestName: test_05_delete_aff_grp_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group by name which does not belong to this user ... === TestName: test_06_delete_aff_grp_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete Affinity Group by id. ... === TestName: test_08_delete_aff_grp_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Root admin should be able to delete affinity group of other users ... === TestName: test_09_delete_aff_grp_root_admin | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy VM without affinity group ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_without_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy VM by aff grp name ... === TestName: test_02_deploy_vm_by_aff_grp_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy VM by aff grp id ... === TestName: test_03_deploy_vm_by_aff_grp_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups ... === TestName: test_04_deploy_vm_anti_affinity_group | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy vms by affinity group id ... === TestName: test_05_deploy_vm_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy vm in affinity group of another user by name ... === TestName: test_06_deploy_vm_aff_grp_of_other_user_by_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy vm in affinity group of another user by id ... === TestName: test_07_deploy_vm_aff_grp_of_other_user_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy vm in multiple affinity groups ... === TestName: test_08_deploy_vm_multiple_aff_grps | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy multiple vms in multiple affinity groups ... === TestName: test_09_deploy_vm_multiple_aff_grps | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Deploy VM by aff grp name and id ... === TestName: test_10_deploy_vm_by_aff_grp_name_and_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity group for a vm ... === TestName: test_01_list_aff_grps_for_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List multiple affinity groups associated with a vm ... === TestName: test_02_list_multiple_aff_grps_for_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity groups by id ... === TestName: test_03_list_aff_grps_by_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by name ... === TestName: test_04_list_aff_grps_by_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by non-existing id ... === TestName: test_05_list_aff_grps_by_non_existing_id | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List Affinity Groups by non-existing name ... === TestName: test_06_list_aff_grps_by_non_existing_name | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
List affinity group should list all for a vms associated with that group ... === TestName: test_07_list_all_vms_in_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Update the list of affinityGroups by using affinity groupids ... === TestName: test_01_update_aff_grp_by_ids | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Update the list of affinityGroups by using affinity groupnames ... === TestName: test_02_update_aff_grp_by_names | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Update the list of affinityGroups for vm which is not associated ... === TestName: test_03_update_aff_grp_for_vm_with_no_aff_grp | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Update the list of Affinity Groups to empty list ... SKIP: Skip - Failing - work in progress
Update the list of Affinity Groups on running vm ... === TestName: test_05_update_aff_grp_on_running_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 42 tests in 976.432s
OK (SKIP=1)
* pr/1134:
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Removing unused parameter in integration test for projects
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Removing unused parameter in integration test
CLOUDSTACK-6276 Fixing affinity groups for projects
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
[4.6] CLOUDSTACK-9075 - As a Developer I want the Private GW feature fixed on single VPCsThis PR fixes the issue we faced with Private Gateways on single VPC when using ACS 4.6.0 and onwards.
The root cause: during the VR refactor, the static routes configuration was left unimplemented.
This PR also improves the existing Replace ACL test and adds a new test, that cover the Private Gateway in a more complete way.
The new test does the following:
1. Create 2 VPCs
2. Create 2 Tiers - 1 per VPC
3. Deploy 2 VMs - 1 per Tier
4. Acquire 2 pub IPs - 1 per VPC
5. Create 2 PF rules - 1 per pub IP
6. Create 2 ACLs + rules - 1 per VPC
7. Assign new ACLs to Tiers
8. Create 2 Private GWs - 1 per VPC
9. Replace the Pvt GWs ACLs
10. Create 2 Static routes - 1 per Pvt GW
11. SSH into VM1 (VPC1) and from there ping VM2 (VPC2)
There is also a test for Private Gateways on Redundant VPCs. But I found out that the feature is broken in when used with rVPCs. It will be addressed in a separate Issue/PR.
I'm running the tests. Will post results as soon as they are ready.
* pr/1151:
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Uses the same vlan since it should have been already released
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Adds VPC static routes test
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Covers Private GW ACL with Redundant VPCs
CLOUDSTACK-9075 - Add method to get list of Physical Networks per zone
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Merge 4.6there is one (simple) conflict so for formailty's sake I make this a pull request.
@utscweizhou en @remibergsma please have a look/test-run
* pr/1155:
CLOUDSTACK-9022: move storage.cleanup related global configurations to StorageManager
CLOUDSTACK-9022: keep Destroyed volumes for sometime
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
* 4.6:
CLOUDSTACK-9022: move storage.cleanup related global configurations to StorageManager
CLOUDSTACK-9022: keep Destroyed volumes for sometime
Conflicts:
server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java
CLOUDSTACK-8988: Removed unused adapters from async-job-component.xml.I was looking the file /cloud-server/test/async-job-component.xml, and I found an adapter configuration that seems to have no use. The reason for that is explained as follows.
The adapter configuration is the following:
<*adapters key="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.StorageAllocator"*>
<*adapter name="Storage"
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitStorageAllocator"*>
<*param name="storage.overprovisioning.factor"*>2<*/param*>
<*/adapter*>
<*adapter name="
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.RandomStoragePoolAllocator"*>
<*param name="storage.overprovisioning.factor"*>2<*/param*>
<*/adapter*>
<*/adapters*>
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitStorageAllocator"
The class "com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitStorageAllocator" does not exist. The only reference for it is found in the following file:
- /cloud-server/test/async-job-component.xml
Therefore, we can conclude that there is no need for this line at that file.
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.RandomStoragePoolAllocator"
Additionally, the class RandomStoragePoolAllocator.java is never used. The only reference is found in the following file:
- /cloud-server/test/async-job-component.xml
I found a project called cloud-plugin-storage-allocator-random. This project has only one package that contains only one class, which is the RandomStoragePoolAllocator.java. Despite the names that are the same, the class in cloud-plugin-storage-allocator-random project and the class referenced in - /cloud-server/test/async-job-component.xml have different packages. Therefore, I removed that configuration from async-job-component.xml and the project that contains only the RandomStoragePoolAllocator class that is never used.
Consequently, I had to remove the following lines from the */cloud-client-ui/pom.xml*:
<*dependency*>
<*groupId*>org.apache.cloudstack<*/groupId*>
<*artifactId*>cloud-plugin-storage-allocator-random<*/artifactId*>
<*version*>${project.version}<*/version*>
<*/dependency*>
Furthermore, after I removed that configuration I noticed that there is no such class StorageAllocator.java. However, it appears that exists test for it, like the following classes:
- StorageAllocatorTestConfiguration.java
- StorageAllocatorTest.java.
I am not sure if these classes are tests for the class StorageAllocator.java and for the possible configuration I have just removed. If they are, we can remove both classes. Can someone help me on checking that?
* pr/943:
fixed references in async-job-component.xml for storage allocators
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Create test cases to getPatchFilePath method and class names changed In this commit we created tests cases for the respective classes in package com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.
We added test cases to check the implementation of com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getPatchFiles. Therefore, we test in a more comprehensive way the tests that already exist to check the code of com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getPatchFilePath.
We added a new abstract class, called com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBaseTest.java
This class has two tests methods:
* com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBaseTest.testGetPathFilesExeption(CitrixResourceBase), this method tests if the getPatchFilePath() method throws the com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException.CloudRuntimeException when the com.cloud.utils.script.Script.findScript(String, String) return a null value;
* com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBaseTest.testGetPathFilesListReturned(CitrixResourceBase), this method tests the correct return value from getPatchFilePath() method, basically, verify if the returned list contain the file with the same absolute path that was retrieved from the findScript method.
We also changed the name of those test classes, the change was basically remove the Path word from the name of classes.
* pr/944:
created tests cases for method "citrixResourceBase.getPatchFiles"
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
CLOUDSTACK-8868: use PasswordGenerator.generateRandomPassword() to generate systemvm passwordsgenerateRandomPassword() is supposed to create root user passwords. Right now it is only used on the guest VMs. The format of the passwords it creates are of the form "random 3-character string with a lowercase character, uppercase character, and a digit" + random n-character string with only lowercase characters".
For whatever reason it was that we use generateRandomPassword() for guest VM root user passwords(maybe more secure?) we should use the same function for system VM root user passwords.
Tests:
manually tested that password is generated in proper format and am able to login to cpvm with the new password. ex: zD2ztm, tR8snbwhq
```
$ mvn -pl server test -Dtest=ConfigurationServerImplTest#testUpdateSystemvmPassword
-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running com.cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImplTest
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (com.cloud.utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.487 sec - in com.cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImplTest
Results :
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 7.781 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2015-09-16T14:17:07+05:30
[INFO] Final Memory: 60M/466M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
```
* pr/841:
CLOUDSTACK-8868: change the default vm.password.length to 10
CLOUDSTACK-8868: use same method to generate passwords for system/guest vms
removed commented code
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
CLOUDSTACK-9080: Resource limits for Primary arent respected during attachprimary store resource limit check is not performed while attaching a
volume to a vm. Added them same.
Also added a marvin test case to verify the same.
Testing:
BEFORE
No error is shown in UI when trying to attach a volume even after reaching the resource limits.
```
mysql> select * from resource_limit where type="primary_storage";
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
| id | domain_id | account_id | type | max |
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
| 10 | NULL | 4 | primary_storage | 21474836480 |
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=4 and type='primary_storage';
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
| id | account_id | domain_id | type | count |
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
| 63 | 4 | NULL | primary_storage | 48318382080 |
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
```
AFTER
Following error message is shown in UI and the volume is not attached
The resource limits stays the same
```
mysql> select * from resource_limit where type="primary_storage";
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
| id | domain_id | account_id | type | max |
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
| 10 | NULL | 4 | primary_storage | 21474836480 |
+----+-----------+------------+-----------------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=4 and type='primary_storage';
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
| id | account_id | domain_id | type | count |
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
| 63 | 4 | NULL | primary_storage | 48318382080 |
+----+------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
```
Marvin test: nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg --zone=xen-zone0 --hypervisor=xenserver test/integration/component/test_ps_resource_limits_volume.py
before the change
```
# do ... === TestName: test_attach_volume_exceeding_primary_limits | Status : FAILED ===
AssertionError: Resource count 23 should match with the expected resource count 22\n
```
After the change
```
# do ... === TestName: test_attach_volume_exceeding_primary_limits | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 1178.354s
OK
```
* pr/1107:
CLOUDSTACK-9080: Resource limits for Primary arent respected during attach.
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Removed unused code from the EngineHostDao Implementation After analysing the code within the EngineHostDaoImpl class, we noticed that methods:
countBy;
findByGuid;
findAndUpdateDirectAgentToLoad;
findAndUpdateApplianceToLoad;
markHostsAsDisconnected;
listAllUpAndEnabledNonHAHosts;
findLostHosts;
getRunningHostCounts;
getNextSequence;
countRoutingHostsByDataCenter;
updateResourceState;
findByTypeNameAndZoneId;
findHypervisorHostInCluster;
lockOneRandomRow;
And variables:
status_logger;
state_logger;
Have no usage. Thus, in order to clean up the code, we decided to remove them from EngineHostDaoImpl and its interface (EngineHostDao).
All of EngineHostDaoImpl's attributes were set to private, given that they are not accessed by any other class.
* pr/942:
Removed unused code from the EngineHostDao Implementation.
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
[4.6.1] CLOUDSTACK-9022: keep Destroyed volumes for sometimefor now, the Destroyed volumes will be expunged in Storage cleanup thread, no matter when they are destroyed.
In Expunging vm thread, we expunge the Destroyed vms which have been destroyed at least 'expunge.delay' seconds. We add the similar configuration for volumes.
same to #1029 , for 4.6
* pr/1145:
CLOUDSTACK-9022: move storage.cleanup related global configurations to StorageManager
CLOUDSTACK-9022: keep Destroyed volumes for sometime
This closes#1029
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Add marvin test to verify if DomainAdmin is able to delete the tags on public ip addressPlease go through bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9084 for more details.
Testcreation, adding and removing tag on public IP address ... === TestName: test_24_public_IP_tag | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 254.724s
OK
* pr/1122:
Incorporated review comments from the PR
Add marvin test for bug CS-38356 Bug-Id: CS-38356 Reviewed-By: Self
Signed-off-by: Daan Hoogland <daan@onecht.net>
CLOUDSTACK-9092: L10n fix in "Add LDAP Account page"fixed two strings on the "Add LDAP Account page"
After the change: (with a test string in messages_ja_JP.properties file)
* pr/1139:
CLOUDSTACK-9092: L10n fix in "Add LDAP Account page"
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Show Agent name in Ping responseBefore:
<pre>DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Ping from 66</pre>
After:
<pre>DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-4:null) Ping from 66 (n01)</pre>
Makes it easier to search for hosts in the logs. Most loglines contain both the hostId and hostName.
* pr/1143:
Show Agent name in Ping response
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
* 4.6:
Use version for RC branch name instead of branch
make sure all files are updates with new version
Update L10N resource files with 4.6 strings from Transifex (20151129)
Fix secondary storage not working with swift
CLOUDSTACK-9083: Add disk serial to kvm virt xml
make sure all files are updates with new versionDuring the previous release I had to edit these manually. This will fix that so all versions get updated.
* pr/1146:
Use version for RC branch name instead of branch
make sure all files are updates with new version
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Update L10N resource files with 4.6 strings from Transifex (20151129)Small update of L10N files before the 4.6.1 release candidate
cc @remibergsma
* pr/1138:
Update L10N resource files with 4.6 strings from Transifex (20151129)
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Fix secondary storage not working with swiftOriginal PR and discussion at #1112
* pr/1133:
Fix secondary storage not working with swift
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
[4.6] CLOUDSTACK-9083: Add disk serial to kvm virt xmlAdds disk serial ids based on volume uuids to the virt xml. This may be useful
for appliances/software that needs some serial ids on the VM disks. This does not
impact existing/running VMs, the vm virt xmls will be updates for running VMs
the next time they are stopped/started.
For testing, disk serial (of debian based systemvm) in the virt xml matched that
in /sys/devices/pci0000:00:0000:00:07.0/virtio4/block/vda/serial.
We currently don't support scsi-blcok devices for which serial is not supported,
for this we've added a DeviceType (LUN) which may be used in future and a check
to not add the serial to the xml if disk type is LUN.
Refer: https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsDisks
* pr/1121:
CLOUDSTACK-9083: Add disk serial to kvm virt xml
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
CLOUDSTACK-8866 : restart.retry.interval is being used instead of migrate.retry.interval during host maintenanceThe frequency at which Cloudstack tries to migrate the VMs is currently controlled by the global parameter "restart.retry.interval" which has a default value of 600 seconds or 10 minutes.This has to be changed to use "migrate.retry.interval" which by default is 120 seconds or 2 minutes . Cloudstack uses restart.retry.interval for all operations-migrate,restart,stop,destroy.
* pr/834:
CLOUDSTACK-8866 : restart.retry.interval is being used instead of migrate.retry.interval during host maintenance
Signed-off-by: Daan Hoogland <daan@onecht.net>
* 4.6:
CLOUDSTACK-9020: UI enhancements from metrics view
CLOUDSTACK-9064: The users should be able to create multiple Guest Shared Networks in same Vlan ID, same Physical Network and same network, just with a different IP ranges.
CLOUDSTACK-9078: Gave scripts executable permissions.
CLOUDSTACK-9076: Changed ownership of directory /var/lib/cloudstack to cloud.
Cannot list vlanipranges by keyword
[4.6] Cannot list vlanipranges by keywordBefore change:
cloudmonkey> list vlanipranges keyword=118
: Caught: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@18f36b6e: SELECT vlan.id, vlan.vlan_id, vlan.vlan_gateway, vlan.vlan_netmask, vlan.ip6_gateway, vlan.ip6_cidr, vlan.data_center_id, vlan.description, vlan.ip6_range, vlan.network_id, vlan.physical_network_id, vlan.vlan_type, vlan.uuid, vlan.removed, vlan.created FROM vlan WHERE ( OR vlan.description LIKE ** NOT SPECIFIED ** ) AND vlan.removed IS NULL ORDER BY vlan.id ASC LIMIT 0, 500
After change:
cloudmonkey> list vlanipranges keyword='118'
count = 1
vlaniprange:
id = 0d80fd9c-cd6b-4f99-96c6-261420e75f58
account = system
domain = ROOT
domainid = 2044762d-c4a5-11e3-8379-005056ac4490
......
* pr/1085:
Cannot list vlanipranges by keyword
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
CLOUDSTACK-9064: The users should be able to create multiple Guest Shhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9064
CLOUDSTACK-9064: The users should be able to create multiple Guest Shared Networks in same Vlan ID, same Physical Network and same network, just with a different IP ranges.
* pr/1116:
CLOUDSTACK-9064: The users should be able to create multiple Guest Shared Networks in same Vlan ID, same Physical Network and same network, just with a different IP ranges.
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
[4.7] CLOUDSTACK-8958: add dedicated ips to domain (account for now)For now, we dedicate ip pool to account, however, other accounts in the same domain cannot fetch the ip from this ip pool.
By dedicating ip pool to domain, accounts in the domain can fetch the public ip from same ip pool.
* pr/1007:
CLOUDSTACK-8958: throw an exception if project account cannot be found
CLOUDSTACK-8958: add dedicated ips to domain (account for now)
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Removal of DefaultUserAuthenticator empty class.The DefaultUserAuthenticator is an empty class, extending from the
AdapterBase and implementing the UserAuthenticator interface. The class
is not being used as a marker and it's sole use is to be extended by
other UserAuthenticators. Noticing that the class had no purpose, I
removed it and made it's children extend from it's superclass and
implement it's interface instead. Also, I removed the @Local tags from
those classes, since EJB is not used anymore.
* pr/1100:
Removal of DefaultUserAuthenticator empty class
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
CLOUDSTACK-9081 Migration of vm across clusters fails in clustered MS setupStorage motion of vm across clusters/xenserver-pools fails in a
clustered management server setup. In xen storage motion we have to send
a migrate_receive command to the destination host, followed by
migrate_send command to the source host. The sr and network detials of
the destination host have to be passed in migrate_send command on the
source. While migrating across clusters the source and destination
resources are seperate objects. To pass this information across
resources we have to send seperate migrate with storage receive and send
commands to the resource. In a clustered ms setup these commands may
have to be forwarded to another ms as the resource may be owned by it.
The serilization of the command and answer objects fails in such case as
it doesn't understand the xapi sr and network objects. Made a change to
serialize these objects in the resource layer and pass the around as
strings in the command and answer objects.
Reviewed-By: @likitha
Author: @devdeep
Tested-By: @sailajamada
* pr/1118:
CLOUDSTACK-9081 Migration of vm across clusters fails in clustered MS setup
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
[master] ui: Fix undefined check in instances.js, regression from 459d638(fix is already included in the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1106 for 4.6 as well)
* pr/1119:
ui: Fix undefined check in instances.js, regression from 459d638
Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
we also changed the name of those test classes, the change was basically
remove the “Path” word from the name of classes.
change the private method
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getPatchFiles
to protected
added new class in test cases
CID-1339965 handle return value on failurecoverity reported this as new last week. It has been in the code for ever, i.e. since initial git commit. Minor issue, easy fix.
* pr/1129:
CID-1339965 handle retrun value on failure
Signed-off-by: Remi Bergsma <github@remi.nl>
Koushik Das
Remi Bergsma
Daan Hoogland
sanjeev
sanjeevn
Wilder Rodrigues
Rohit Yadav
Wei Zhou
Wido den Hollander
Rajani Karuturi
Milamber
Patrick Dube
pedro-martins
weingartner
