1. remove Garbagecollection primary storage allocator. other storage allocators fails may because there is primary storage with the same tag, it is not caused by no primary storage capacity.
2. delete template will try to delete templates in secondary storage in the API.
status 11497: resolved fixed
GarbageCollecting
Changes:
- Added a new API 'migrateSystemVm' backed by MigrateSystemVMCmd.java to migrate system VMs (SSVM, consoleproxy, domain routers(router, LB, DHCP))
- This is Admin only action
- The existing API 'migratevirtualmachine' is only for user VMs
Conflicts:
api/src/com/cloud/api/ResponseGenerator.java
api/src/com/cloud/api/commands/ListHostsCmd.java
api/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementService.java
api/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmService.java
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java
server/src/com/cloud/server/ManagementServerImpl.java
status 11036: resolved fixed
1) Use row locks instead of global lock when update resource_count table. When update resource_count for account, make sure that we lock account+all related domains
2) Insert resource_count records for account/domain at the moment when account/domain is created.
3) As a part of DB upgrade, insert missing resource_count records for all non-removed accounts/domains
status 11361: resolved fixed
Most of these were truly duplicates. In the one case that was not a duplicate, I checked the behavior in CloudStack and used the string that it presented.
1) Added new apis: createFirewallRule, deleteFirewallRule, listFirewallRules
2) Modified existing apis - added boolean openFirewall parameter to createPortForwardingRule/createIpForwardingRule/createRemoteAccessVpn. If parameter is set to true, open firewall on the domR before creating an actual PF rule there
Modified backend calls appropriately.
3) Schema changes for firewall_rules table:
* startPort/endPort can be null now
* added icmp_type, icmp_code fields (can be not null only when protocol is icmp)
4) Added new manager - FirewallManagerImpl
1. Are there multiple hosts connect to the same local storage pool due to 2.1.x bug
2. Is there any missed premium upgrade
either true answer of above cause mangemnt stopping and asking user to contact Cloud.com support
1. Are there multiple hosts connect to the same local storage pool due to 2.1.x bug
2. Is there any missed premium upgrade
either true answer of above cause mangemnt stopping and asking user to contact Cloud.com support
Use a new target "system-integrity-checker" in components.xml/components-premium.xml.
All checkers must be explicitly specified in XML file, they will execute before any components load
status 10860: resolved fixed
Use a new target "system-integrity-checker" in components.xml/components-premium.xml.
All checkers must be explicitly specified in XML file, they will execute before any components load
status 10860: resolved fixed